Afghanistan Clusterfuck

July 3, 2009 - Leave a Response

It’s almost pointless to talk about Afghanistan and the American war there. It’s become apparent that the people in charge have lost their minds.

What began as a legitimate attempt to capture the people who set up the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington became an arrogant, ignorant, and destructive attempt to destroy all terrorists everywhere for all time.

The perpetrators of this insane American policy claim that it has kept the terrorists from attacking in the United States again.

That is not true.

Al Qaeda, or whoever, has performed an amazing jujitsu attack on the United States. They haven’t needed to attack us. The Republican administration under Bush and Cheney did the work for them by gutting the Constitution, breaking the laws of the United States and breaking international law, wasting hundreds of billions of dollars, wasting thousands of American lives and hundreds of thousands of innocent Afghani and Iraqi lives, and allowing the American economy to crash and burn. Al Qaeda has already won the war. The only question for the Americans is how much more damage will they allow to their country.

But behold, by a wave of the hand, a twist of the magic wand, by an act of illusion and delusion that would win the admiration of David Copperfield, the United States war on terror has morphed into a war on a medieval religious sect of arrogant, ignorant, murderous thugs going under the name of Taliban.

The new mission is to bring democracy and security to Afghanistan.

From today’s Globe, in a Washington Post story by Rajiv Chandrasekaran:

US military and diplomatic officials say that the vast majority of Afghans, even those in violence-wracked places such as Helmand province, do not want to be ruled by the Taliban and its extremist ideology. The officials contend that if Afghans are provided security and basic services, they will switch allegiances and support the local government.

They may not want to be ruled by them, but if that’s so why aren’t they fighting the Taliban. Why are American troops doing the killing and the dying?

The Americans are continuing the delusion that they can kill an ideology with guns and artillery.

As for the locals switching allegiances to the local government, has anyone asked how long that will last once the Americans are gone? Or how long the Americans will have to stay to maintain the fiction of switched allegiance?

Apparently not.

The Afghans, like most people in the world, will go along to get along. They’ll do what they need to do to survive under whichever thugs have the most guns and the strongest will.

As for the local government to which the Americans want to direct the Afghans, the Afghans know better than the Americans that the local government is corrupt to its core. From the front page of the Globe:

But in April, Afghan president Hamid Karzai pardoned the five [drug traffickers] men. One was the nephew of a powerful politician managing Karzai’s reelection campaign, and the presidential decree ordering their release notes that they had ties to a well-respected family, according to a senior Afghan official.

Those pardons – and at least five others in recent weeks – have outraged US officials working to combat drug trafficking in Afghanistan, the world’s biggest supplier of heroin and opium, and raised fears that Karzai will set more traffickers free in a bid to curry favor with influential families before the presidential election on Aug. 20.

That’s what American soldiers, and NATO soldiers, are dying for in Afghanistan. That and the American Republican delusion that killing foreigners solves all problems. That particular delusion continues to be enabled by Democrats who are simply afraid of loud-mouthed, arrogant, ignorant Republicans despite controlling Congress and the White House.

The situation in Afghanistan is untenable, as it would be anywhere. Americans should not be fighting the Taliban. At best they should be teaching Afghanis to fight the Taliban. Give the villagers small arms, train them in basic maneuvers and tactics, and let them understand that if they want to be free of the Taliban and their ilk they will have to fight for freedom themselves.

As long as the United States continues to think that fighting wars like those in Iraq and Afghanistan will bring an end to terror, then Al Qaeda, or the terror organization du jour, will win. They will have destroyed the United States from within without ever again crossing the American border.

As for Bin Laden and his associates, they’re still free despite the gutting of America by American politicians braying for Bin Laden’s head. Blunderbuss armies stomping about in the mountains of Afghanistan will get him only by luck. High tech flying robots dropping bombs on civilians will only provide Bin Laden more protection.

And while all of that goes on, America crumbles. Its economy is in shambles and the government claims it is fixing it by giving the power to fix it to the same people who crippled it. States are going bankrupt. Essential services are being shut down. School systems fail to educate, if not fail outright. Highways, transportation infrastructure, weaken and crumble. Businesses and families crash and burn under the weight of increasingly impossible health care costs, while the government flails in fear of the very corporations and politicians responsible for the crisis in health care, and proposes nothing more than inadequate band-aids to prop up the current system.

Meanwhile, somewhere in the hills of a South Asian country, a handful of thugs laugh at the insanity of an America that chooses to hurl its ship of state onto the ancient reefs of Afghan mountains rather than limp home under tattered sails to fix itself.

Why Do Healthcare Discussions Make Smart People Stupid In America?

July 2, 2009 - One Response

The Lion suspects that most people in America, aside from the virulent zombies in the Republican Party, would agree that Barack Obama is an intelligent man. Highly intelligent, highly accomplished.

And yet even he can be driven into stupidity by the irrationality of the healthcare debate. To wit, from today’s Globe:

Obama addressed public worries head on: Why no single-payer system, one Internet questioner asked. It might work elsewhere, but so many Americans have become so used to receiving health insurance through their employers, it’s too dramatic a change, Obama explained.

That’s from a town-hallish meeting Obama held at Northern Virginia Community College yesterday.

And once again the man misses the point. People do not care, finally, where their health insurance comes from. In truth, they do not even care about health insurance.

They do care about healthcare.

They do want to go to their doctor when they’re sick and not worry about how to pay for it. They want to know they can go to the hospital when their condition is serious and not worry that they’ll have to declare bankruptcy or spend the rest of their life paying off a hospital bill. They want to know that they can get an illness treated in its early stage when it can be cured, they want to know that they don’t have to wait for illness to become so severe that they can no longer work or enjoy life. They want to know that they can take their kid to the hospital without fearing the cost will drive them into debt.

And employers would like to get the burden of health insurance off their backs and off their books so they can compete with every other modern country that has national health care instead of competing at a constant financial disadvantage. And employers would like to think that their employees could stay healthy and productive because they get the care they need when they need it.

If the United States government provided quality healthcare, paid for by taxes, no one would miss employer-provided health insurance. The current system kills and cripples people and it cripples the nation’s economy.

It’s time for Obama to get his head out of the sand, it’s time for the Democrats to stop coddling the insurance industry, and it’s time to tell the Republicans to piss off. The Republicans have nothing to offer, nothing to contribute, and want nothing better than to return to the days of old and sick people dying in the street, to the days of poorhouses and workhouses and debtor’s prisons. The Republicans want nothing better than to rake in personal fortunes gained from the misery and suffering of the American people.

The American people want good health care and they want to be free of health insurance terror.

Arizona Wants Gun Nuts To Carry Concealed In Bars

July 2, 2009 - 2 Responses

Arizona is the latest state to take flight from reality into the cozy caverns of paranoid fear that drive its legislators into abject stupidity. The State Senate just voted 19 – 8 to allow people to carry concealed weapons into bars.

The Lion wonders if the Loony Legislators from Tennessee migrated to Arizona recently.

From today’s Globe, the opposing lines of thought:

“We don’t let people drink and drive, why should we let them drink and carry guns?’’ said Senator Paula Aboud, Democrat of Tucson, who voted against the bill.

Ah, a sensible and thoughtful argument. The gun nuts of the NRA, who are behind the campaign to arm every man, woman, and child, whose largesse extends even to allowing terrorists to purchase guns in America because the Constitution says every two-year-old must have a gun, would of course find Ms. Aboud’s argument preposterous.

Supporters say they should be able to protect themselves even if they happen to be inside a business serving alcohol.“It’s very important that criminals are now afraid rather than law-abiding citizens,’’ said Senator Jack Harper, Republican of Surprise, the bill’s sponsor.

Perhaps if these people are so afraid of being accosted every time they leave home they should simply stay home, locked behind barricades of steel and chain to keep out the raging hordes of Goths, Huns, and Vandals rampaging across the land and headed straight for them whenever they leave the house. A word to the wise, Mr. Harper, a word to the wise. (It is, of course, no Surprise to The Lion that Senator Harper is a Republican. They have pretty much cornered the market of Dumbass these days.)

But perhaps we might look at the issue from the point of view of Mervyn the Mugger. Mervyn is not the brightest bulb in the criminal lineup, but he is a very good, accomplished mugger. The job pays the rent and he’s not about to give it up because his state is governed by NRA idiots.

What he will do now is assume that anyone he accosts is armed, thus requiring more violence, more force, and it’s probably best to knock the mark out before relieving him of his wallet and his gun. On the other hand, the old ways may work just as well. After all, how fast can you get your gun out of your holster when a determined street criminal has a knife set to slide between your ribs? And if Mervyn has his own gun, he’s not going confront his victim in an old-fashioned Western quick draw contest, which would appear to be the favorite fantasy of NRA gun nutters. Mervyn’s gun is going to be out and ready and that gun in the mark’s holster will have become a useless chunk of metal (or modern high impact plastic… whatever). Mervyn will walk away with a new gun and a fresh wallet. The gun nut victim will likely be leaning against the nearest wall, shaking and pissing his pants. Who’s afraid now, Senator Harper?

Yes, Senator Harper, the criminal class in Arizona is now quaking in their boots from the sheer joy of suddenly gaining access to an easy flood of new guns.

And the stupid class, having checked their brains at the door, now resides in the Arizona State Senate.

 

Republican Ayatollah (Senator Mitch McConnell) Sabotages Fair Elections In America

June 30, 2009 - 2 Responses

The High Poobahs of the Republican Party, continuing their unceasing efforts to undermine and destroy democracy in America, have deliberately and effectively crippled the Federal Elections Commission as part of their ongoing plan to sabotage effective government.

Chief Penis Waver Senator Mitch McConnell is the sleazebag behind this particular effort. TPM has the details.

These guys have no moral authority to complain about elections in Iran when they are so determined to undermine and cripple free and fair elections in this country.

Michael Jackson And The News: Put A Sock In It!

June 28, 2009 - 3 Responses

How much longer must the country be subjected to the crocodile tears and endless repetitions of trivia and nonsense from Jackson’s life by news entertainers?

Subjecting the nation to endless hours of Jacksonian drivel, day after day, is nothing more than pandering to ratings and sucking up to the one percent of people who worship him.

This sort of thing is why news ‘personalities’ should be laughed at and mocked in public, this is why the ‘news’ can no longer be trusted to deliver timely and accurate information on anything that matters. Their priorities are their hair and their ratings.

Televised news has all the authenticity of a television reality show. Both are a case of idiots speaking to idiots. Jackson is just the latest case of the media betraying the real needs of the real world.

The little freak is dead. His music lives on. Stick him in the ground and move on.

Maybe It’s Time To Do Unto Iran…

June 28, 2009 - 4 Responses

Now that the mullah leadership of Iran has revealed its psychotic soul to the world and reveled in the blood of innocents, perhaps it’s time for the United States to rethink its options.

The Lion sees a couple of possibilities.

Given that the mullahship is now likely to feel even more paranoid about the Satans of the West, it’s not unreasonable to suggest that they might actually change their tune and go full-bore after nuclear weapons. And for the same reason they might well consider using them, albeit covertly through hidden channels.

So maybe it might not be a bad idea now to bomb their nuclear facilities. And maybe nail a few top mullahs at the same time.

That said, The Lion notes that it would be a bad idea to include Israel in any such action. They should be clearly kept out of it. Using one rabid dog to attack another rabid dog is not a good idea in any case. Pretty soon all the dogs in the neighborhood would be infected.

Another possibility for turning out the mullahs would be to covertly arm the populace. Smuggle in small arms. Put them in the hands of people who are willing to go into the streets and fight the Islamothug basij and police and military.

If they want freedom they’re going to have to fight for it. They say they’re willing. They’re also outgunned. The United States, of course, is in no position to make changes in Iran. Leading people to freedom at the point of a gun doesn’t work well: the costs are huge in lives and money, the results are wildly uncertain at best, and the wounds take generations to heal, if ever. The only liberty that lasts and that works is the liberty a people gain for themselves.

All that said, neither course of action suggested here is likely to be wise (The Lion is not noted for wisdom). The results of the first action would likely be another World Trade Center action in due time, followed by another act of revenge by the United States, followed by…

The second course, arming the dissidents, can have no foreseeable outcome. It might turn out well, it might simply lead to chaos and the birth of an even more psychotic theocracy. The quandary is elemental though. Removing the theological nutcases that run the country would be a plus, locally and globally, but the only people who can do it, absent popping a cruise missile into a meeting of the chief mullahs, are the Iranians, and it is ludicrous to think they can do it with their bare hands against the highly organized, armed, and vicious thugs employed by the government.

The Lion has come to think that talking to the current Iranian leadership is like talking to a Christian fundogelical about evolution: there is no point to it, they are not competent reasoners, no fact will sway them from ignorance. Perhaps the best thing to do is to do nothing. The leadership are neither rational nor sane and we might be best off simply waiting for the government to collapse under the weight of its own psychosis. Of course, it might not hurt to give a little nudge here and there.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Michael Jackson Dead. Farrah Fawcett Dead. News Media Self-Destruct Again.

June 26, 2009 - 12 Responses

Okay, nobody remembers that Farrah Fawcett died yesterday about an hour before Jackson kicked off. Apparently the news media have also forgotten she died, even though they were in the midst of trying to suck ratings from her death.

Now, of course, they’ll try to suck bigger ratings from Jackson’s death. They’ll treat us to days and days of 24/7 Jacksonia to be followed by extensive ongoing coverage of the vultures who will assuredly crawl out to feed on his corpse. It is possible, though, that since the guy who turned crotch-grabbing into high art owed $400,000,000, that we’ll be spared the Anna Nicole Smith Syndrome: the Jackson vultures might not want to put themselves at risk of having to assume some of that debt.

The psychotic Iranian mullahs are probably laughing their rag hats off in relief. They know the news media will be focusing on the death of the whiny, seriously neurotic entertainer instead of on their brutal, death-dealing attacks on their own people.

The Republicans in America are no doubt gleeful that the news shows won’t be paying attention to them as they sabotage any meaningful reform on health care, on energy use, on the financial crisis. And of course we won’t be hearing about Governor Sanford waving his penis in Argentina.

The Lion would venture a guess that there are two hundred ninety nine million people in the United States who don’t give a damn about Jackson, but who will be subjected to the suppression of legitimate news and information by the established news media as they seek ratings and as they polish their egos and careers on Jackson’s corpse.

No wonder the country’s in such a mess.

Another Godly Republican Cheats On His Wife, Weeps In Public, Begs Forgiveness, Models Hypocrisy For Children

June 24, 2009 - 6 Responses

Governor Mark Sanford of South California misled his staff, abandoned his post, ran off to Argentina to be with his lover, and then came back and held, just now, the obligatory God-quoting, weepy press conference claiming how sorry he was about all of it while spouting dime-store philosophy about life.

Is it obligatory for Republicans to cheat on their wives and subject the public to the pathetic spectacle of saying how sorry they are?

And why do they cling to their public office after demonstrating just how unfit for it they are? This guy not only cheated on his wife, he misled his staff as to his whereabouts, he left them no way to get in touch with him, he abandoned his duties as Governor of South Carolina.

And The Lion wishes they’d not bring God into it when they whine about their failings. God didn’t run off to Argentina to screw a broad. God didn’t push John Ensign between the legs of his employee. But it’s always God this, God that, with these guys.

They’re hypocrites and liars. And if they lie and cheat on their families you can bet that they can’t be trusted in public office.

Charles F. Bass, Deluded Republican Whiner, Indulges False Memories Of Republican Greatness

June 23, 2009 - 8 Responses

Charles F. Bass, identified in today’s Globe as a ‘former US representative from New Hampshire’, writes a long, pathetic whine, crawling with lies and distortions, about the greatness of the Republican Party and its need to recover its former glory.

Here’s some of it, with snarls provided by The Lion:

Why has the Republican Party let the Democrats cast us as the party that caters to the rich and the elite? Wasn’t it a Republican president who freed millions of Americans from the bondage of slavery?

First, note the plaint of victimization. Note the whine of ‘The Democrats did this to us. It’s all their fault.’ That’s typical Republicanism. No matter what they do, no matter who they hurt, no matter the destruction their policies wreak in the country and the world, it’s not their fault.

And isn’t it about time this bunch of hypocrites, this crew of immoral and unethical loudmouths stopped pretending they had anything to do with what Lincoln did a hundred and fifty years ago. Convenient of Mr. Bass to forget the horrors visited on Blacks for the next hundred years by racist, segregationist Americans. It wasn’t a Republican who brought about the Civil Rights legislation of the Sixties, but it was Republicans who fought desperately against it. And convenient also for Mr. Bass to forget Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy, which was nothing but blatant racism, served up with regard only for the votes it could garner from white bigots. Perhaps Mr. Bass conveniently forgot Ronald Reagan opening his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, with a coded speech on ‘states rights’ to the people who just loved their Klan so much when their Klan murdered three civil rights workers named Schwerner, Chaney, and Goodman and buried them in an earth dam.

Lincoln would spit in the faces of modern Republicans, including Mr. Bass.

Why has the Republican Party let the Democrats cast us as the party that opposes a clean environment? Wasn’t it a Republican president who created the first national park in America, the National Park Service, and the White Mountain National Forest in New Hampshire? Wasn’t it a Republican president who created the Environmental Protection Agency, authored the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Hazardous Waste Act?

To answer Mr. Bass’s first question, Republicans spent the last eight years doing everything they could to increase the amount of filth corporations friendly to the Republican Party were allowed to pour into the environment. Mr. Bass prefers to look to the distant past rather than to the present, in which his party has done everything it could to foul the earth, the air, the rivers, and the seas.

Mr. Bass and others will no doubt say that the policies of the Bush administration were an aberration. Mr. Bass will no doubt forget that the Republicans lined up in perfect solidarity with Bush’s destructive policies of greed and destruction. In that, Mr. Bass is a true Republican.

Why has the Republican Party let the Democrats cast us as the party of big oil, gas, and coal? Wasn’t it a Republican president who broke up the huge oil trusts in America? Wasn’t it a Republican president who first called for energy independence through the development of alternative energy resources?

The Republicans are the party of fossil fuels because the fossil fuel corporations owned the Republican party. And as for ‘alternative energy resources’, that is nothing more than Republican-speak for tearing up every available inch of American soil for more oil and more gas instead of buying it overseas. To sane people ‘alternative energy resources’ means wind, solar, geothermal, and so on, sources that will, one hopes, avert a catastrophic climate change that will wipe civilization from the face of the planet. Republicans never met an oilman’s dollar they didn’t want to pocket.

And let’s not forget that it was a Republican president who rejected the only significant climate plan, the Kyoto Protocol, that had a chance of at least starting international cooperation on the matter. The same President, cheered and enabled by the Republican Party and Congressional Republicans, fought tooth and nail against every climate initiative for eight lost years.

Why has the Republican Party allowed Democrats to portray us as the party of war? Have we forgotten that Republican presidents ended the Vietnam War, broke the back of communism without firing a single shot, and successfully liberated Kuwait from Iraq in only 19 days?

Republicans are the party of war, the party of chaos, the party of destruction and death. They’ve earned the title ‘Party of War’.

A Republican president invaded Cambodia and turned that country into a genocidal slaughterhouse. A Republican president dragged the Vietnam war on in order to keep his party in power. It wasn’t a Republican president that ended the war: it was a Republican president who was in office when the Vietnamese ran the United States out of their country.

As for Kuwait, let’s not forget it was a Republican president who used a false story about babies being dumped from incubators to gin up support for that war. It was a Republican president who told the Shi’ites in Southern Iraq to revolt against Saddam Hussein and then stood by while Hussein slaughtered them by the tens of thousands.

And as for the great myth of Ronald Reagan bringing down communism single-handedly, that is one of the greatest loads of crap ever foisted on the American public. In fact, Ronald Reagan was one of the greatest loads of crap ever foisted on the American citizenry. The claim that he ended communism, a claim that lives in the mind and mouth of every Republican, completely belies and demeans the efforts of Americans for the previous fifty years, and denigrates the real work that was done by Russians, fully at risk of life and liberty, to change their system of government from the inside.

Ronald Reagan was a virtually senile old man from Day One. He was driven by ideology at the expense of reason, fact, and evidence – an all too common Republican affliction, brought to its height, or depths, by George W. Bush. Anyone who criticizes school lunch programs by saying ketchup is a vegetable, as Reagan did, demonstrates a pathology all too common among Republicans, one that fervently believes dollars are far more important than people, and that seeks to enact that belief into law.

So yes, Mr. Bass, the Republicans are the party of war. It was Republicans who brought us Iraq, again, and again based on lies, on falsehoods of the basest sort, canards dealt to the public for the sole purpose of satisfying the bloodthirsty egos of Republicans in the White House and in Congress. Republicans are considered the party of war because they have earned the designation.

And they earned it by beating up on weak countries with weak armies. Republican presidents invaded Grenada, invaded Panama, invaded Iraq. Yeah, big bad macho Republican presidents invading pathetically weak little countries and crowing about it. Undoubtedly Mr. Bass is as proud of that as he would be if Republicans had actually fought and won a war with an enemy of equal power to ours. But Republicans don’t fight those kinds of wars.

In fact, they don’t really want to fight at all. Their last President and his Vice-President refused to fight in Vietnam. In fact their last President, after landing a cushy stateside berth in the Air Guard and noting on his enlistment form that he did not want to serve in the war zone, abandoned his post so he could do some politicking. And the other guy simply refused outright. He had ‘other priorities’.

And there’s the little matter of comparing Congressional Republicans to Democrats on the matter of military service. Republicans didn’t. Democrats did. And it’s Republicans who don’t give a damn about sending American children off to war to do the killing and dying that Republicans use to keep themselves in power.

You’ve earned the ‘Party of War’ label, Mr. Bass, you’ve earned it, and it’s a label written in the blood of innocents you sent to die, of innocents you and yours slaughtered from the comfort and safety of your plush Congressional and White House offices.

And why has the Republican Party become the defender of a healthcare system no one likes? Why can’t we be the party that responds to the Democrats’ determination to federalize healthcare by offering our own proposals that make healthcare more competitive, more affordable, and more efficient?

Because, as with the fossil fuels industry, the healthcare business owns you. It was a Republican president who pushed through a budget-busting Medicare drug program and who insisted that it not have the power to bargain for lower prices from the pharmaceutical industry, the same industry that wrote the bill.

Republicans can’t offer a better healthcare plan because they don’t want a rational plan that provides good healthcare for all Americans. Republicans can’t offer a better healthcare plan because Republicans are dedicated to seeing that the private insurance companies continue to reap obscene profits off the suffering, pain, and misery of sick Americans. Republicans can’t offer a better healthcare plan because they don’t want to, because their ideology insists that it is more dignified for a sick person to die in the street in front of a hospital than for the government to help that person: after all, helping him might weaken his moral fiber.

The column goes on and on with more drivel and lies and distortions. Mr. Bass isn’t interested in reality, and neither are his fellow Republicans. They have nothing to offer America, not anymore, and haven’t had for a long time. They said nothing but ‘Yes’ to George W. Bush’s destructive, sickening policies, and they say nothing but ‘No’ to Barack Obama as he tries to fix the horrific damage done by Bush and the Republicans who followed him in jackbooted lockstep.

Mr. Bass closes his column with the statement, “If we do all of this, we will return to our rightful place as the party that has earned the trust, admiration, and faith of the American people.”

Abraham Lincoln would spit in their faces, and Teddy Roosevelt would probably shoot the sleazy bastards.

Quickies… Iran, Healthcare, Bipartisanship

June 21, 2009 - 11 Responses

Iran

Iran is simple.

The government is a collection of corrupt thugs foisting the worst, medieval parts of a religion on the people as a governing principle. The Supreme Leader is violent, brutal, corrupt. He does not respect intellect, he does not respect liberty, he does not even respect his own religion and laws.

If the Iranian people really want to be free, to live under a rational and respectful government, they have to hit the streets by the hundreds of thousands, by the millions.

They have to fight the militias, they have to fight the government troops, they have to die in as many numbers as it takes to rid themselves of the priests.

Putting a priest, of any religion, in charge of any governing system guarantees tyranny, brutality, and the triumph of oligarchic or dictatorial power over reason and liberty.

Iran is simple. Fight to the death or live on your knees for the rest of your life.

Healthcare

The Republicans in the United States have two things to say about health care run by the government.

They say it denies choice to consumers.

They say people don’t want a government bureaucrat between them and their doctors.

They are, as usual, badly misinformed and full of crap.

A single payer national system lets you go to any doctor in the country. The only choice people have now is to wade through a welter of confusing insurance plans which limit ‘consumers’ to doctors approved by an insurance company.

As for bureaucrats, as the current system stands, insurance bureaucrats whose primary mission is to generate profits for their company make the decisions about what care a ‘consumer’ gets. They say ‘No’ based on profit. The care you need to live is far less important to them than the money the company makes. Government bureaucrats don’t have that conflict.

And by calling people who need healthcare ‘consumers’ the Republicans give full voice to their pro-money, anti-people philosophy.

Bipartisanship

Bipartisanship is crap. The Republicans don’t want it, and they don’t have anything useful to offer anyway.

The sooner the Democrats and Obama realize the Republicans are as useful as an appendix and as smart as a garden slug (apologies to the slugs) the sooner they could get on with marginalizing the clowns more than the clowns have already marginalized themselves.

The Republicans are the ones who have declared war on the laws, on the Constitution, and on the people of the United States, not the Democrats. The Democrats should treat the Republicans like the scummy betrayers and criminals they are.

Obama may be a decent man and a smart man and a sincere man, but if he doesn’t kick the Republicans in the nuts hard and often, they’ll destroy any hope of bringing this country into a rational and decent place in this century.

He could make a good start by disavowing Bush policies of secrecy, and by opening government criminal investigations into the criminal behavior of Bush, Cheney and their cronies.

He could improve on that by slamming every Republican who opens his mouth to spit out a lie or distortion, and doing it immediately, openly, and loudly.

The Republicans are liars, backstabbers, and hypocrites. They are interested only in power for themselves. They are incompetent at governance. They are a blight on the country, on the people, on democracy itself. They should be treated accordingly.