An Anti-Clawdie, The First Ever, Awarded To A Gentleman From Virginia

The Lion found a letter to the editor written by a fellow in Virginia who’s just wrong, a letter so wrong that it deserves the first ever Anti-Clawdie Award.

Our man starts off with mild praise for Senator Barack Obama’s recent speech encouraging fathers to get more involved with their children. “Heartening,” said Mr. Virginia.

But that’s not enough for him. He goes on to say:

While this secular progressive society romanticizes the notion of having children outside of marriage (especially in Gloucester), it is a choice that has devastating consequences for children. If Obama wants to earn the support of the mainstream of America, he should work to bring back the taboo that once made it rare for women to have children before getting married.

Secular?

Hardly. Something like ninety percent of Americans hold spiritual beliefs in one religion or another. Perhaps Mr. Virginia had in mind installing a theocratic government? Perhaps teaching creationist fantasies in the public schools? Perhaps teaching that women are lesser creatures than men and have to walk three steps behind men at all times? Sound about right, Mr. Virginia?

Progressive?

Have you looked at the White House lately, Mr. Virginia? Or the Congress? Republicans who want to drag us back into the Nineteenth Century are calling the shots. Civil liberties, a hallmark of progressivism and the Constitution, are shredded daily by that crowd. Immigration agents of the fascistic Department of Homeland Security routinely arrest and deport American citizens and lie to Congress about it (The Nation, June 23, 2008). Rich people get huge tax breaks, effectively giving them a free ride on the backs of the working class. Republicans in the White House routinely hand over the reins of government agencies to unqualified political hacks, and then proclaim government doesn’t work. Perhaps you remember Katrina and Rita? When the next major hurricane crashes into Virginia, do you want Republican hacks bumbling to your aid, or do you want qualified professionals running the agencies whose job it is to rescue, support, and rebuild your families and communities?

The snide slash at Gloucester teens was uncalled for. It was rude. It was thoughtless. It was ignorant.

And how about those devastating consequences, Mr. Virginia? Exactly what did you have in mind? Naturally we’ll never know, but we can guess that you’re thinking joblessness, homelessness, crime, drugs, prison, yada yada yada, all the cliches that people who make your argument always manage to mention.

Those arguments presume that the unmarried mothers must be social deviants, must be drug addicts, must be ignorant and incompetent, must be lazy, and whatever other myths the wingnuts on the right can think up.

But never, not once, do the wingnuts propose a humane society, one that provides daycare so that mothers can work, that provides healthcare so the children won’t suffer third-world diseases in the midst of America, that provides training and schooling so that disadvantaged mothers can better themselves and make a better life for the children for whom Mr. Virginia has prescribed ‘devastating consequences’. The Lion can feel pretty certain that not one red cent of Mr. Virginia’s tax money would be allowed to support progressive social programs, no sir, not from him, not one red cent, by golly.

He’d rather see children undergo ‘devastating consequences’.

His answer to his problem with perception? A father in every home:

The answer is not government. It is personal responsibility, and a return to the basic understanding that children need a married mother and father in the home to be raised as productive members of society.

Yup. Good old dad. Apparently Mr. Virginia isn’t going to distinguish drunken wife-beating child abusers from decent men struggling to make a living in a failing Republican economy. Or ignorant religious fanatics who rule their families with the iron hand of stupidity, bigotry, intolerance, and hatred. Just as long as there’s a man in the house, married to the woman in the house. Any man’s better than no man, right, Mr. V?

As for the ‘basic understanding’, well, no. There’s the basic mythology of Father Knows Best. Is that where Mr. Virginia gets his understanding of family sociology from? Good luck with that.

The Lion would also note that Mr. Virginia has, with his final ringing phrase about ‘productive members of society’, insulted millions of mothers and children. Mothers who struggled to do the best they could for their kids, despite the heavy odds imposed against them by an atavistic American society and atavists like Mr. Virginia. Children who grew to a crime-free and drug-free adulthood, who got a decent education, who hold jobs and pay their bills and are good, decent men and women.

Yes, Virginia, you just trashed all those people.

And of course you don’t define a couple of things in your statement. ‘Personal responsibility’ for one. But The Lion knows that’s just Republican Conservative code for ‘Screw you, I got mine and I don’t care what your problems are, you’re on your own, dumbass.’ That’s the modern religious Republican take on ‘Love one another’ and ‘Do unto others…’

And then there’s the matter of defining ‘productive members of society’. The Lion is not sure he wants to know what that means to Mr. Virginia, but it does bring to mind mindless drones pushing paper from one cubicle to another, or factory drones taught never to question, never to ask, never to think, but just to do what their Republican factory owners tell them to do. The Lion suspects that Mr. Virginia may well regard hedge fund managers who make hundreds of millions of dollars a year screwing around with other people’s money as the most productive members of society, despite the fact that they don’t create anything useful and contribute pretty much nothing to s0ciety. And of course the ten-dollar-an-hour security guard that ‘protects’ the steel and glass towers these parasites play in isn’t anywhere near as productive, is he?

Be that as it may…

Mr. Virginia might want to review a report from the CDC on birth statistics. One bit of it states:

A key change in marital status patterns has been the large increase in cohabitation among unmarried couples. In 1980-84, 29 percent of out-of-wedlock births were to cohabiting couples; 10 years later this proportion increased to 39 percent. This group accounts for most of the increase in births to unmarried women since the early 1980’s.

Oh, look, Mr. Virginia, there’s daddies in those evil, unmarried homes.

Fewer than 3 in 10 nonmarital births are to teenagers, but the majority of teen births are out-of-wedlock. Ages 20-29 are the peak childbearing years, and women in their twenties account for over half of all nonmarital births. The number of births to unmarried teens was 2 percent lower in 1999 than in 1998.

Wow! How about that? Adults having children. The Lion suspects that Mr. Virginia would condemn with the same vigor a professional woman who can actually afford daycare and health care and other necessities as he does the teens of Gloucester who apparently got bad advice from their sex ed classes. He would have to slam those hard-working professional women, who choose not to have man messing with their lives, in order to be consistent. Can’t be giving women credit, now can we, Mr. Virginia?

So, to Mr. Virginia, a nameless fellow from Virginia, today’s first ever Anti-Clawdie Award. Congratulations, Mr. V, don’t spend it all in one place. Like, fer instance, a homeless shelter, or a community daycare center, or a drug rehab center, or anything like that. No, no, no. That might be taking personal responsibility, real responsibility, for your fellow humans instead of the cheap cop-out kind touted by the Republicans and the Conservatives.

Good luck with all that, Mr. Virginia.

P.S. The Lion lied. There’s no money with the award. There’s not even a plaque with fancy script on it. There’s just this impolite post on the Grumpy Lion blog. That and two bucks will get you a cup of coffee, but not a latte or anything like that.

Advertisements

14 Responses

  1. Ric this is an example of your writing style keeping one from commenting. You have put forth an excellent argument-hell there’s no argument, Mr. Virginia is myopic in social vision.
    I would’ve loved to comment on a number of things that I have either issue w/ or a different take but I don’t want to support the views you truthfully and completely laid shredded.
    I will go out on a ledge though and say that to the demographic Obama was specifically addressing others such as Cosby,Steele and McWhorter have tried to shine a light on the root issues. 2 out of 3 conservative for sure. I’ll add me and ask that we be viewed as not all bad and not all standing w/ Mr.Va..

    Like

  2. alfie –

    Mr.V painted with a broad brush. How can one not spear him with a polemic? πŸ™‚

    I know that Obama was addressing blacks for the most part, though his remarks could well address families in general. And I’m not against the concept. Fathers should play an important part in the family. But not all families have fathers, and some that do would be better off without them. And in a society that is truly and actively concerned about raising children to be the best they want to be, there would be social programs that facilitate that, and all society would be responsible. The RepCons like Mr. V don’t want that; it might require them to pitch in some tax money; it might require them to realize that those women and children out there are human beings, and that but for the grace of luck and chance, that would be them struggling to survive in a society that values money more than anything else and is afraid of just about every idea in the world that doesn’t fit their narrow, ill-informed ideological preconceptions.

    As for my comments on Reps and Cons as generally applied, well, hell, I’m just doing what they’ve been doing for decades. They can dish it out but they can’t take it, eh?

    I’ll grudgingly concede that there may be some Reps and Cons who have some intelligence and decency, but I’m not going sit here and write nuanced pieces and nuance all the power out of the writing. Besides, the vast majority of Reps have been supporting Bush and the Cons down the line no matter how many verified facts are thrown at them. I’ve seen figures indicating that the vast majority of our troops in Iraq still believe Hussein and Iraq were behind 9/11, despite solid evidence to the contrary, including Bush’s own statement in a TV interview that there was no connection (after, of course, he had pushed the lie for a couple of years and killed several thousand troops and untold numbers of Iraqis).

    I’m out to get as many of these people out of government and into cages as possible with my little two cents worth. I don’t really care who gets offended in the process. If I’m not offending somebody I’m not doing my job.

    That’s not to say that I’m calling you, personally, evil and dangerous and a curse on the Constitution, of course. You’ve always been civil and honest and I appreciate that. But most of your brethren, I’m aiming at ’em and pulling the trigger whenever one of their pointy little heads pops up, as one did in this letter. I’m also willing to take on any Democratic clown who commits Lionable sins, but there are just so many more RepCons out there and I’m just one lone middle-aged guy with a keyboard and a blog.

    So come on in off the ledge, Alfie. We’re not going to agree on much, but there’s no point splattering the pavement with our body parts.

    πŸ™‚

    P.S. What means ‘laid shredded’? Typo, no doubt, but I can’t figure it out.

    Like

  3. That letter was definitely deserving of the first Anti-Clawdie. But now that you’ve opened up that can of worms, how are you going to resist giving out hundreds of Anti-Clawdies every fucking day. Is it possible to choose the “wrongest” letter among so many that are wrong?

    Also, now that we know the Clawdie has an Evil Twin, are we to expect an Anti-Grumpy Lion (maybe a Chipper Lion) to appear suddenly?

    Shit, I hope not.

    Like

  4. Ex –

    Anti-Clawdies are a lot like antimatter black holes. One AC can blow apart thousands of AC-worthy letters. (Go ahead, logic that!)

    As for the Chipper Lion, not a fucking chance in hell! I might as well swallow antimatter.

    Like

  5. Do French-cut canned stringbeans count as antimatter?

    Like

  6. No. Those count as anti-food.

    Like

  7. That is some kick ass blogging. To take that one little nugget and basically skin these awful fuckers alive and reveal their lies, their bullshit and their sick, irrational fears–that is brilliant.

    Brilliant.

    Like

  8. Warren –

    I’d blush but I know you’re right… πŸ™‚

    Like

  9. Great post, Ric. I’m appalled that I live in the same state as Mr. Virginia. Ah, well – I guess there are jerks everywhere.

    Like

  10. The thing with Mr. Virginia is he’s surrounded by other Mr. and Mrs. Virginias. There, huddled together under their rock, they all share the same stupid ideas and are never challenged so they have no idea how moronic they are. One says something stupid, the others shout, “yeah!” and that’s that. One of the glorious things about the internet, aside from its ability to deliver porn, is being able to find such nonsense expertly flayed open and pinned on a wax tray like a science experiment with all the nasty bits labeled as Ric has done for us here.

    Like

  11. Before I got to your Father Knows Best reference I thought, “This guy is like Reagan. He pines for the 50’s sitcom fantasy world.”

    People need to stop dreaming and think. The brain gets better exercise that way.

    Like

  12. I have to laugh when I hear people talk about the ‘good old ’50s’. The days of forced marriages (which, because of the dificulty of divorce, forced abusive marriages to continue). The days of no cohabitation or premarital sex (which meant that lots of incompatible couples got married (leading to my previous (incomplete) thought)). The days of no abortions (or at least very difficult for most Americans (which forced many young couples to have children they could not support (limiting educational opportunities and increasing the chances for an abusive marriage))). The 1950s were not Happy Days, any more than the Civil War South was Gone With The Wind, or 10,000BC was 10,000BC.

    Like

  13. I think the good old Fifties ended in 1956 when the Hungarian Revolution revealed the United States as a pompous bag of wind whose word was worthless.

    Like

  14. Spanqi –

    People need to stop dreaming and think. The brain gets better exercise that way.

    But what about dreaming about exercising? That’s supposed to work, right?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: